• About

Ghada's SoapBox

~ A socio-political critic's variety show

Monthly Archives: March 2015

Hypocrisy Alert: DEA agents party it up at drug cartel-funded “sex parties”!

29 Sunday Mar 2015

Posted by Ghada Chehade in Current Events, Politics

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Current Events

dea-party

I recently read a news article entitled “DEA agents had ‘sex parties’ funded by drug cartels…” As the article states, a report by the US Justice Department has revealed that, “US Drug Enforcement Administration [DEA] agents working abroad took part in ‘sex parties’ with prostitutes that were funded by the drug cartels they were meant to be battling.” In other words, DEA agents—the people who are suppose to be fighting the US’ “war on drugs”— were partying with hookers paid for by the same international drug lords they are suppose to be fighting and bringing to “justice.” Let’s not forget that these are federal agents, with huge amounts of power to arrest others for illegal, drug related behaviours. I guess it would be counter-intuitive for them to start arresting each other!

I for one am not the least bit surprised. If there’s one thing you can count on in this world, and especially in the US, it is for the people in power—be it political, legal, religious or financial power—to often be complete hypocrites. I wouldn’t be the least bit surprised if these so-called “drug enforcement” agents were also using drugs at these hooker-filled sex parties. After all, what’s a drug cartel sponsored sex party without some “party favours”!? And considering that these parties were funded by drug cartels, one can assume that the agents wouldn’t have much trouble “scoring some drugs.” I can picture it now; American DEA agents doing lines of cocaine off of foreign prostitutes’ toned midriffs. But I digress, there are no reports (yet) of DEA agents actually doing drugs, so lets stick to the facts at hand, shall we: sex parties with hookers paid for by drug lords!

Now, I am not “personally offended” by this story. Personally, I could give two flying flips if these guys are partying with hookers and drug cartels. Now their wives might not be too impressed but that’s not my issue. No, my outrage is more of an intellectual variety; it is rooted in justice and logic, because these party boys also just happen to be federal DEA agents. Now in a “democracy,” the myth goes, certain forces and institutions—such as, umm, the Law—are given power over the rest of us lowly mortals because they are supposedly righteous and are upholding justice and what is “right.” Of course, they also happen to be the same institutions that define what is “right.”

The biggest issue is the hypocrisy of it all; the utter and brazen double speak and double standard by a system of power that purports to know what is “right” and lawful, and which has the power—and audacity—to police and judge and incarcerate the rest of us—for doing the same “bad” things (or in this case, probably far less bad things than) they do. It’s the same hypocrisy at play when politicians preach family values then cheat on their spouse or when homophobic preachers turn out to be closet homosexuals, etc. But this DEA story is far worse than just personal hypocrisy because it is lawmen breaking the law, drug enforcement officers colluding and partying with mega drug dealers.

Why claim to be fundamentally opposed to something—and condemn and police other people over it—when you are doing it yourself!? Why wage a bogus “war on drugs”—that has incarcerated millions of mostly poor, black and brown males—while participating in the drug trade (1980s contras scandal, anyone)? Why outlaw prostitution and then party with prostitutes on foreign soil? Basically, why break the same laws and rules you mercilessly enforce against the rest of us?

Could it be that the laws are only meant for the lowly masses; that the laws exist to control and domesticate the people—the underclass—while the elites do as they like?! Could it be that, as Kahlil Gibran once wrote, “the nets of the law are devised to catch small criminals only”? When you learn of federal drug enforcement agents who, according to the article, “also were provided money, gifts and weapons from cartel members,” it really makes you wonder! What’s next, are we going to learn that the same government regimes that started a global “war on terrorism” also sometimes support or indirectly fund Islamic terrorists?! Oh, wait. This. Just. In:

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-22906965

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oidaJHwZZgs

http://countercurrentnews.com/2014/09/u-s-general-openly-admits-we-helped-build-isis/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tifCnaKrlaE

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/white-house-isis-a-terrorist-group-but-taliban-an-armed-insurgency/ (an extra treat)

Share this:

  • Tweet

Like this:

Like Loading...

Will German pilot be labeled a terrorist or is that label reserved for “certain people”?

27 Friday Mar 2015

Posted by Ghada Chehade in Current Events, Society

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Current Events

german pilotIt is now being revealed that, tragically, the recent Germanwings crash was the result of intentional actions by co-pilot Andreas Lubitz (pictured above). It is being reported that Lubitz waited until the other flight pilot left the cockpit, locked the door and then proceeded to purposely fly the plane into the French Alps, killing himself and all 149 people on board. The tragic situation is still under investigation and further details—such as Lubitz’s motive or mental state at the time of the intentional crash that killed everyone on board—have not yet emerged. It is possible that Lubitz suffered some kind of a mental breakdown or that he was suicidal and maliciously and selfishly took the lives of 149 other people with him. Or maybe he had some political or social grievances.  At this point, we simply do not know what caused him to do such a horrible and murderous thing. And since Lubitz perished in the crash, we may never know.

The point I’d like to raise is this: will the media and officials (and people in general) label Lubitz a terrorist, now or in days to come? So far, I have not seen media reports using this language to describe the co-pilot and his sick actions. The reality is that we do not know enough to know what his motives were, if they were politically motivated or if he was having some kind of personal or mental episode. We still do not know and it is too early to say. Though I would argue that if someone selflessly, sadistically and senselessly takes the lives of 149 other people then they are a terrorist, whether they have political or religious motive or not. If Lubitz was suicidal then why not simply take his own life? The very act of intentionally murdering 149 innocent people along with him is an act that will forever terrorize the family of those innocents, frighten the public, and, is now forcing airlines around the globe to change their chock pit policies.

At the end of the day, this man killed innocent people by flying a plane into the side of a mountain. And when people crash planes into inanimate objects we tend to call them terrorists (and rightly so!). Still, no one is calling Lubitz a terrorist. But we can bet that had this sick and murderous co-pilot been a Muslim (or a brown non-Muslim even), and had he done the exact same thing as Lubitz, we would have automatically labeled him a “terrorist.” Before knowing any of the details, before knowing the circumstances or mental state of the pilot, his very identity as a Muslim (or Arab or numerous other ethnicities that fit the “evil other” image) would be enough to label him a terrorist, regardless of the details.

In the case of the Germanwings crash all we know so far is that the pilot intentionally crashed the plane and he happens to be a German, and no one is calling it terrorism. But if he were a Muslim man, it is highly unlikely I could write the same words. For instance, that: All we know so far is that the pilot intentionally crashed the plane and he happens to be an Arab or Muslim, and no one is calling it terrorism. That does not read very “realistically” because the reality is, in the current climate in which we live, if someone does something bad or horrible and they happen to be Muslim, then their actions will automatically be labeled as terrorism, even before we know any of the details. As Bill Maher so inanely once put it: “not all Muslims are terrorists but all terrorists are Muslims.” Using this (ill) logic, when non-Muslim people commit acts that could potentially (or actually) be considered terrorism, we cannot or will not label it as such, because that label is reserved only for Muslim people (and other unlucky brown folks that could be mistaken for or confused with Muslims).

I’ve scanned the media coverage and no one is labeling Lubitz a terrorist. But if the co-pilot of Germanwings flight 4U9525 were Muslim (or brown) it is very likely we would label him first, and ask questions later. But alas Lubitz is a white European and, arguably, has what comedian Paul Mooney once called “the complexion for the protection.”

UPDATE: On March 28 media reported that Lubitz might have been suffering from depression, describing him as a “troubled pilot.” Still no mention of terrorism. This is typical of media coverage of mass murders by white men; they’re often described as troubled or lone wolfs, etc.

Share this:

  • Tweet

Like this:

Like Loading...

Why isn’t anyone talking about Angelina Jolie’s privilege?!

25 Wednesday Mar 2015

Posted by Ghada Chehade in Current Events, Society

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Current Events

Angelina-Hollywood actress and director Angelina Jolie has been in the media a lot recently over her decision to have a preventative/pre-emptive double mastectomy and, more recently, to have her ovaries and fallopian tubes removed. She decided to have the surgeries after she discovered that she carried a gene that gave her an 87 percent risk of developing breast cancer and a 50 per cent risk of developing ovarian cancer.

While the media has been busy hailing her bravery and courage, such reportage eclipses the reality of her immense privilege. Jolie is not the average American woman. She is a multi-millionaire that can afford to have these surgeries in the first place and also to pay for the expensive reconstructive breast surgery and hormone replacement therapy required afterwards; not to mention paying for the expensive genetic screening tests. Millions of American women do not have adequate health insurance or income to make these procedures an option. And even if insurance providers did cover the double mastectomy, it is unlikely they would cover the cost of reconstructive surgery, which would be considered purely cosmetic in a situation where cancer does not actually (yet) exist. Angelina Jolie’s class—yes, I used the forbidden word class—and immense wealth essentially makes it easier for her to be “brave” enough to have her breasts removed preemptively, knowing that she can afford world-class reconstructive surgery afterwards. Also, some medical professionals feel that promoting invasive and drastic pre-emptive surgeries can promote fear and extreme measures in women who carry the cancer gene (and even some that don’t) but may never actually develop the disease.

Rather than simply highlight the plights and courage of multi-millionaires, stories such as Jolie’s should spark dialogue—including by Jolie herself—about the dismal state of public health care—or lack there of—in a country that regards itself as “number one” in the industrialized world. While the US is the world’s dominant power, it remains one of the only “first world” nations where many or most people cannot even afford cancer treatment let alone hope to have access to radical preventative tests and procedures. As a Canadian I am not fully aware of the US health care system (in Canada, cancer treatment is universally paid for through the public health care system, which the people pay for through their taxes) but I do know of some American friends suffering from breast cancer who are having a hard time getting access to chemotherapy and radiation treatments for lack of insurance.

That is the reality of many (or perhaps even most) people in the US. It is a reality that is far removed from that of Jolie and the uber-rich. Rather than focus on wealthy celebrities that have very very little in common with the general population, we should talk about the increasing austerity and lack of spending that plagues everything from health to education and employment. Until Angelina Jolie has the “courage” to speak publicly about that, and about the right of common people to have access to health care and cancer treatment, we should not be rushing to praise the mega-rich for exercising their privilege.

While I do not doubt that she made these decisions for the sake of her family and children, her recent statement that [with these surgeries], “I know my children will never have to say, ‘Mom died of ovarian cancer,” is an example of her unique privilege. For while she may be fortunate enough to guarantee that her young children will not lose their mommy to ovarian or breast cancer, there are thousands of children (of less privileged women) who will! While loads of cancer deaths are unpreventable, some women (and men) could have been saved with early screening and diagnostics, things many people are not financially privileged enough to have access to. It would be nice if these important social issues were discussed alongside celebrity worship/heroism.

Share this:

  • Tweet

Like this:

Like Loading...

Categories

  • Culture
  • Current Events
  • Electric Universe
  • Geopolitics
  • Philosophy
  • Poetry
  • Political Economy
  • Politics
  • Science
  • Society
  • Uncategorized

Archives

  • March 2023
  • February 2022
  • October 2021
  • July 2021
  • May 2020
  • November 2019
  • April 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • November 2014

©2014-2020

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Follow Following
    • Ghada's SoapBox
    • Join 45 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Ghada's SoapBox
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...
 

    %d bloggers like this: